Arguments, Stories and Criminal Evidence - A Formal Hybrid Theory
نویسنده
چکیده
Any books that you read, no matter how you got the sentences that have been read from the books, surely they will give you goodness. But, we will show you one of recommendation of the book that you need to read. This arguments stories and criminal evidence a formal hybrid theory is what we surely mean. We will show you the reasonable reasons why you need to read this book. This book is a kind of precious book written by an experienced author.
منابع مشابه
The Status of Allegory and Symbolic Language in Quranic Stories: A Review and Critique of the Theory of Fantasization
One of the common views in contemporary Quranic research is the dialog on the existence of allegory and symbolic language in the Quran and Quranic stories. Citing such arguments as the common literary style between the Quranic stories and human stories, the use of symbols with specific modes of expression in the Quran and the cases in which the Divine intent is expressed through questions and a...
متن کاملArguments, Scenarios and Probabilities: Connections between Three Normative Frameworks for Evidential Reasoning1
Due to the uses of DNA profiling in criminal investigation and decision-making, it is ever more common that probabilistic information is discussed in courts. The people involved have varied backgrounds, as fact-finders and lawyers are more trained in the use of non-probabilistic information, while forensic experts handle probabilistic information on a routine basis. Hence, it is important to ha...
متن کاملBurdens and Standards of Proof for Inference to the Best Explanation
In this paper, we provide a formal logical account of the burden of proof and proof standards in legal reasoning. As opposed to the usual argument-based model we use a hybrid model for Inference to the Best Explanation, which uses stories or explanations as well as arguments. We use examples of real cases to show that our hybrid reasoning model allows for a natural modeling of burdens and stand...
متن کاملSense-making software for crime investigation: how to combine stories and arguments?
Sense-making software for crime investigation should be based on a model of reasoning about evidence that is both natural and rationally well-founded. A formal model is proposed that combines AI formalisms for abductive inference to the best explanation and for defeasible argumentation. Stories about what might have happened in a case are represented as causal networks and possible hypotheses c...
متن کاملSense-making software for crime investigation: how to combine stories and arguments?1
Crime investigation is a difficult and laborious process, especially in large cases that involve a mass of unstructured evidence of which crime investigators have to make sense. Because of the difficulty of this task and the high costs of mistakes, it is worth investigating how crime investigators could benefit from support tools. Current professional state-of-the-art software for managing and ...
متن کامل